5515-826 : Influence of river inflow on water quality in Sau reservoir using 1d and 3d hydrodynamic models

CERTIFICATION FOR PEER REVIEW        We are pleased to declare, confirm and certify that  Dr.Hossam Haddad Middle East University , Jordan offered substantial, important, line by line peer review with several comments, important remarks and hints for the article: Title: Influence of river inflow on water quality in Sau reservoir using 1d and 3d hydrodynamic models, ID Number: 5515-826 for the Journal:  WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development The Editor-in-Chief of the journal would like to thank you also for your many thoughtful comments, important remarks, hints, questions, and in general for your really great effort for reviewing this manuscript. Your judgement has helped the Journals and the WSEAS. The strict peer review of all the papers is really very important for us for maintaining the quality of publications as well as the academic integrity of the journal and of the WSEAS publisher. You can post this Certification on the Web, Social Media, Your Website, Blog etc and you can forward it to your dean. Save a copy of this Certification in your records also for further usage. This is especially useful for young scholars.       Dr. Anna Papadimitriou WSEAS Publications www.wseas.com WSEAS: Athens, Greece / Sofia, Bulgaria / Houston, Texas, USA   Date of the Review: 03/31/2022

Your Review was         Your Name (Use only the standard English Alphabet, do not use extended Latin Alphabets) Hossam Haddad Email of the Reviewer (only 1 email please) ******* Your alternative Email (only 1 email please) ******* ID Number of the Paper (the number before the .doc or .docx or .pdf) 5515-826 Title of the Journal (if you do not remember, select "WSEAS Transactions on Systems") WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development Title of the Paper Influence of river inflow on water quality in Sau reservoir using 1d and 3d hydrodynamic models Comments and Remarks (minimum 500 characters) I want to thank you for giving me the chance to review the paper  titled "Influence of river inflow on water quality in Sau reservoir using 1d and 3d hydrodynamic models" I  did read the manuscript The paper is based on a good idea but this paper is poorly written and a little messy. It is probably possible to amend these shortcomings but it would require extensive rewriting considering the following issues : A) The abstract is poorly written does not include any of the overall purpose of the study and the research problem(s) you investigated; the basic design of the study; r the major findings or trends found as a result of your analysis; and or  a brief summary of your interpretations and conclusions. B) The manuscript need to be recreated its not easy to understand. C) The manuscript does not match the journal guidelines. Are the Sessions and their Paragraphs well and clearly written? Which Sessions and which Paragraphs of this paper need extensions and clarifications? The sessions and the paragraphs are related and the manuscript does  clarify the relationship  between the aspects : Arts Marketing, Theaters, Hanoi, Vietnam Please, specify Which mathematical equations in the article need clarifications? Which Theorems need clarifications and extensions? Are the mathematical theorems accompanied by the proper numerical examples? Please, specify. All the equations are good What Simulation / Statistics / Experiments / Experimental Analysis in the paper need extension and more clarifications? In which paragraphs? the density difference between the river and the reservoir, while temperature is usually the main factor controlling density is not clear enough I suggest to clarify . Can you check if the Figures and Tables of the article are dully illustrated and presented inside the text? I recommend  more clarifications or the tables and adding more figures it may help . For Experimental Work. Do you believe that these experiments were really held ? With what Equipment? Where? Are they accompanied with Photos, Tables and other Documentation? Do the authors have the Copyright of the Photos? The experiments are excellent held in a good way with every aspect   For Articles in Biomedical, Financial and Social Sciences we demand strong and well-documented Statistics. Have the authors carried out and included the right Statistical tests like: t-text, Chi Square etc? Please, check. The statistical results are right but also need more explanations. Are the References connected with the main text of the article? Are they adequate? Do the authors have References from the last 10 years or do they have obsolete References? The references which have been used in the manuscript are they need  to be updated and also to match the journal guidelines Do the authors use abbreviations without the necessary explanations? If the authors use the abbreviation GOT, what GOT stands for? Abbreviations are good and clear Date of the Review 03/31/2022 Final Recommendation Accepted After Minor Revision