5515-828 : Security of energy interests of enterprises: innovative competencies of personnel, public administration, and the role of exchange trade

CERTIFICATION FOR PEER REVIEW        We are pleased to declare, confirm and certify that  Dr.Hossam Haddad Middle  East University, Jordan offered substantial, important, line by line peer review with several comments, important remarks and hints for the article: Title: Security of energy interests of enterprises: innovative competencies of personnel, public administration, and the role of exchange trade, ID Number: 5515-828 for the Journal:  WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics The Editor-in-Chief of the journal would like to thank you also for your many thoughtful comments, important remarks, hints, questions, and in general for your really great effort for reviewing this manuscript. Your judgement has helped the Journals and the WSEAS. The strict peer review of all the papers is really very important for us for maintaining the quality of publications as well as the academic integrity of the journal and of the WSEAS publisher. You can post this Certification on the Web, Social Media, Your Website, Blog etc and you can forward it to your dean. Save a copy of this Certification in your records also for further usage. This is especially useful for young scholars.       Dr. Anna Papadimitriou WSEAS Publications www.wseas.com WSEAS: Athens, Greece / Sofia, Bulgaria / Houston, Texas, USA   Date of the Review: 03/31/2022

Your Review was         Your Name (Use only the standard English Alphabet, do not use extended Latin Alphabets) Hossam Haddad Email of the Reviewer (only 1 email please) ******* Your alternative Email (only 1 email please) ******* ID Number of the Paper (the number before the .doc or .docx or .pdf) 5515-828 Title of the Journal (if you do not remember, select "WSEAS Transactions on Systems") WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics Title of the Paper Security of energy interests of enterprises: innovative competencies of personnel, public administration, and the role of exchange trade Comments and Remarks (minimum 500 characters) irst of all thank you for giving me the opportunity to read your research paper titled (Security of energy interests of enterprises: innovative competencies of personnel, public administration, and the role of exchange trade) with great interest. Some areas of the Security of energy interests of firms need to be expanded in order to offer a very clear picture: the inventive capabilities of employees, the function of public administration, and the importance of exchange trade. I have the following suggestions for you in order to help you produce a better paper: A) The title of the manuscript is very interesting but , I think the authors needs to pick some words that are easy to meet all readers levels understand (globally) . B) As the authors submit their work to this journal, it is important to make some connection between the contents and the journal's mission and scope . C) I suggest to add to the title that the study is related to Ukraine. D) The authors have to follow the journal guidelines very well. Are the Sessions and their Paragraphs well and clearly written? Which Sessions and which Paragraphs of this paper need extensions and clarifications? To be honest, the document is well-structured and edited in English, and I am happy with the section arrangement. In my opinion, the abstract and methodology parts could be enhanced. I'd advise an organized abstract with additional technique details. Please, specify Which mathematical equations in the article need clarifications? Which Theorems need clarifications and extensions? Are the mathematical theorems accompanied by the proper numerical examples? Please, specify. As I read the manuscript: 1- Introduction ought to be better ordered . 2- Conclusion requires additional clarification What Simulation / Statistics / Experiments / Experimental Analysis in the paper need extension and more clarifications? In which paragraphs? As I read the manuscript: 1- Introduction ought to be better ordered . 2- Conclusion requires additional clarification Can you check if the Figures and Tables of the article are dully illustrated and presented inside the text? I would recommend recreating a Table containing and to clarify Figures For Experimental Work. Do you believe that these experiments were really held ? With what Equipment? Where? Are they accompanied with Photos, Tables and other Documentation? Do the authors have the Copyright of the Photos? To be honest, the text is outstanding, the tests are well-run, and no images are required For Articles in Biomedical, Financial and Social Sciences we demand strong and well-documented Statistics. Have the authors carried out and included the right Statistical tests like: t-text, Chi Square etc? Please, check. The authors utilized equations to derive their findings, which is acceptable. Are the References connected with the main text of the article? Are they adequate? Do the authors have References from the last 10 years or do they have obsolete References? The text has 18 references, most of them are from the previous three years, and one from 2012, which is also acceptable. Do the authors use abbreviations without the necessary explanations? If the authors use the abbreviation GOT, what GOT stands for? The authors should properly define abbreviations such as (RDN) Date of the Review 03/31/2022 Final Recommendation Accepted After Minor Revision